asked by SharonTheRose, 5/17/2010
WARNING! This answer contains what some might consider MINOR SPOILERS for the first book. Nothing too big or important, but it does deal with an interaction between some of the major characters in the series.
I originally intended for Yvonne to be a very minor character in my first book, then never mention her again. She was supposed to be a source of conflict for Meg: an old friend who Meg fell out of sorts with after they became room mates. In the earlier parts of the first book, this is apparent: Meg is jealous of Yvonne's confidence and good looks, and even briefly fears that Garrett might lose interested of her in favor of her more attractive room mate.
To that end, originally Yvonne was going to be much more of a bitch. She wouldn't have much control over her mouth, and would often be insensitive to other people's feelings. She was going to attempt to steal Garrett from Meg and, after failing, push Meg into leaving and moving in with Garrett. But as I wrote for her, I found that I liked Yvonne and that I kept using her to say things no other character could. For example, the morning after Meg and Garrett's second date Yvonne, amazed Meg hasn't slept with him yet, jokes, "Are you sure you're not a lesbian?"
My attempts to make her a bitch by having her constantly say the first thing that popped into her head failed, and actually resulted in a very likable character who could always be counted on to tell you what she really thought. This side of Yvonne emerged when one of Meg's friends confronted her about how mysterious Garrett seemed. Yvonne was in the room at the time, and it just seemed to me that the character would stick up for Meg without hesitation. From that moment on, I liked Yvonne and decided she was too great a character to not keep around. She never attempted to seduce Garrett or interfere in their relationship in any way.
So, I never wrote the "Yvonne coming on to Garrett" scene, and I never will. Maybe in an alternate universe or something, but not this one. I also briefly intended for Max to hook up with Yvonne after a party, but decided against this. I don't think that Max would be able to put up with Yvonne for even one night, no matter how drunk he got. In fact, I think the drunker Max was, the less patience he'd have for her. Kicking this idea out led to the introduction of one of my favorite characters from any of my books: Max's girlfriend Sadie. I guess that's two scenes I never wrote: Yvonne trying to seduce Garrett, and Meg waking up to find Max in her apartment after he'd had drunk-sex with Yvonne.
Showing posts with label meg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meg. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
From Formspring: Would Meg and Garrett be a "super couple"?
I'm not sure what that means, but I think a more appropriate term would be heroic couple. I think super couple is something they use for soap opera couples who move the story forward through their relationship: like Bo and Hope on Days of Our Lives
or Zack and Kendle on All My Children
. Yes, I know who those people are. Shut up, now you know who they are, too.
In contrast, I think a heroic couple is just that: two heroes paired together romantically. So, Holmes and Watson
wouldn't count (unless you really read into their stories) but Han Solo and Princess Leia
would, because she really likes that he's a scoundrel and he really likes that she's hot and rich. Other examples include Johnathan and Mina Harker from Dracula
; or John and Maureen Robinson from Lost in Space
. But, super couple and heroic couple are relative terms, and I have often heard them used interchangeably so if you prefer to refer to Meg and Garrett as a super couple, I won't stop you. However, a super-couple doesn't have to be heroic: the fictionalization Bonnie and Clyde
, for example, or Megatron
and Starscream
, who--and I don't care what anyone says--were totally a couple.
Meg isn't as much a hero in the first book as she is someone who seems to stumble into one great situation after another until something bad happens. She doesn't decide to take an active role in her fate until near the end of the book, which is actually a big turning point for her and the focus of much of her narrative. Garrett goes through something much like this as well. By the second book, the couple is making things happen together. So, I'd say that they manage to become a heroic couple by the end of the first book and into the second, but for most of the first they are just getting things hammered out. I don't necessarily mean "hammered" in a sexual sense, but there is quite a bit of that. The events surrounding their lives grow apparent in the second book, and their role in it together is solidified by the third.
In contrast, I think a heroic couple is just that: two heroes paired together romantically. So, Holmes and Watson
Meg isn't as much a hero in the first book as she is someone who seems to stumble into one great situation after another until something bad happens. She doesn't decide to take an active role in her fate until near the end of the book, which is actually a big turning point for her and the focus of much of her narrative. Garrett goes through something much like this as well. By the second book, the couple is making things happen together. So, I'd say that they manage to become a heroic couple by the end of the first book and into the second, but for most of the first they are just getting things hammered out. I don't necessarily mean "hammered" in a sexual sense, but there is quite a bit of that. The events surrounding their lives grow apparent in the second book, and their role in it together is solidified by the third.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)